← Back to Blog
VultrComparison

Best Vultr Alternative: RAW vs Vultr in 2026

Vultr has been a reliable choice for developers who want affordable cloud compute without the complexity of AWS. But in 2026, their pricing no longer leads the market, their dashboard feels dated, and their API has fallen behind. Here is why developers are switching to RAW.

Vultr in 2026: What You Actually Get

Vultr offers cloud compute, bare metal, and managed Kubernetes across 32 locations. Their entry-level pricing starts cheap, but costs climb fast once you need real resources.

Vultr Pricing (Cloud Compute)

  • Regular: 1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM, 25 GB SSD — $6/mo
  • Regular: 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM, 80 GB SSD — $24/mo
  • Regular: 4 vCPU, 8 GB RAM, 160 GB SSD — $48/mo
  • Regular: 8 vCPU, 16 GB RAM, 320 GB SSD — $96/mo
  • High Frequency: 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM — $30/mo
  • Managed databases: starting at $15/mo
  • Bandwidth: 3–5 TB included, then $0.01/GB overage

Vultr’s entry tier looks competitive at $6/mo for 1 vCPU. But that is a shared vCPU on spinning disk. Once you need 4 GB RAM and consistent performance, you are at $24/mo — and that is still shared infrastructure.

Vultr’s Dashboard and API Limitations

Vultr’s control panel has not changed meaningfully since 2020. Compared to modern platforms:

  • No CLI-first workflow: Vultr has an API and a basic CLI, but neither supports one-command deploys or infrastructure-as-code natively
  • No git push deploys: You manage deployments manually or build your own CI/CD pipeline
  • Limited monitoring: Basic CPU/bandwidth graphs. No integrated alerting, no log aggregation
  • Slow provisioning: Bare metal servers take 5–15 minutes to deploy. Cloud instances take 30–60 seconds
  • No team collaboration: Sub-users exist but lack granular permissions and audit logging

The API itself is functional but limited. No WebSocket events, no real-time status updates, and rate limits that make automation cumbersome for multi-server setups.

RAW: What’s Different

RAW gives you dedicated bare metal servers — not shared VMs — with a modern CLI, instant provisioning, and transparent pricing. No noisy neighbors, no shared CPU credits, no surprise bills.

RAW Pricing

  • raw-2 ARM: 2 vCPU, 4 GB, 40 GB NVMe — $6/mo
  • raw-4 ARM: 4 vCPU, 8 GB, 80 GB NVMe — $11/mo
  • raw-8 ARM: 8 vCPU, 16 GB, 160 GB NVMe — $21/mo
  • raw-16 ARM: 16 vCPU, 32 GB, 320 GB NVMe — $41/mo
  • Database: install on same server — $0 extra
  • Bandwidth: 20 TB included

Direct Comparison: Vultr vs RAW

FeatureVultrRAW
2 vCPU / 4 GB$24/mo (shared)$6/mo (dedicated)
4 vCPU / 8 GB$48/mo (shared)$11/mo (dedicated)
8 vCPU / 16 GB$96/mo (shared)$21/mo (dedicated)
StorageSSD (shared IOPS)NVMe (dedicated)
Bandwidth3–5 TB included20 TB included
Root access✓ (shared VM)✓ Full SSH (dedicated)
Deploy time30–60 seconds13 seconds
CLI deploysBasic CLIOne-command deploy
Database+$15/mo managed$0 (same server)
MonitoringBasic graphsBuilt-in health checks

For a typical 4 vCPU / 8 GB workload, Vultr costs $48/mo (shared). RAW costs $11/mo for dedicated hardware. That is a 77% savings.

Where Vultr Still Wins

Credit where it is due. Vultr has advantages in specific scenarios:

  • 32 global locations: If you need a server in Johannesburg, Seoul, or Sao Paulo, Vultr has more regions
  • Windows support: Vultr offers Windows Server instances. RAW is Linux-only
  • Managed Kubernetes: Vultr Kubernetes Engine is a solid managed K8s option
  • Block storage: Attach additional SSD volumes up to 10 TB
  • Marketplace apps: One-click deploys for 60+ popular applications

Where RAW Wins

  • 75% cheaper for equivalent specs
  • Dedicated hardware: No noisy neighbors, no CPU throttling
  • NVMe storage: Dedicated IOPS, no shared disk contention
  • 20 TB bandwidth: 4–6x more than Vultr includes
  • 13-second deploys: Fastest provisioning in the industry
  • Modern CLI: Deploy, manage, and monitor from your terminal
  • No database markup: Install PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redis on the same server

Migration from Vultr to RAW

Switching takes about 15 minutes. Here is the process:

Step 1: Deploy a RAW Server

npx rawhq deploy

Pick your plan. Server is ready in 13 seconds.

Step 2: Export Your Data from Vultr

# SSH into your Vultr instance
ssh root@your-vultr-ip

# Create a backup of your application
tar czf /tmp/app-backup.tar.gz /var/www/your-app

# Export your database
pg_dump -U postgres your_db > /tmp/db-backup.sql

Step 3: Transfer to RAW

# Copy files to your new RAW server
scp /tmp/app-backup.tar.gz root@your-raw-ip:/tmp/
scp /tmp/db-backup.sql root@your-raw-ip:/tmp/

Step 4: Restore on RAW

# SSH into your RAW server
ssh root@your-raw-ip

# Extract application files
tar xzf /tmp/app-backup.tar.gz -C /

# Install and restore PostgreSQL
apt install postgresql -y
sudo -u postgres psql -c "CREATE DATABASE your_db;"
sudo -u postgres psql your_db < /tmp/db-backup.sql

Step 5: Update DNS

Point your domain to the new RAW server IP. Once DNS propagates, cancel your Vultr instance.

Who Should Switch

  • Developers running web apps, APIs, or side projects who want more resources for less money
  • Startups at $1k–$10k MRR who need predictable costs without shared-VM performance variance
  • Teams running databases alongside their application and paying double for managed DB instances
  • Anyone frustrated with Vultr’s dated dashboard and limited automation tooling

Who Should Stay on Vultr

  • You need Windows Server instances
  • You need managed Kubernetes with minimal setup
  • You require a specific region that RAW does not cover
  • You depend on Vultr’s marketplace one-click apps

The Bottom Line

Vultr was a great option when the alternative was paying AWS prices for basic compute. But in 2026, you can get dedicated bare metal with NVMe storage and 20 TB bandwidth for 75% less than Vultr’s shared VMs.

If you are paying Vultr for compute, you are overpaying for shared infrastructure. RAW gives you dedicated hardware, a modern developer experience, and pricing that makes the decision obvious.

Try RAW Free

npx rawhq deploy

7-day free trial. 13 seconds to deploy. No credit card.